Cursor Pro
The most popular AI code editor subscription — $20/mo for Claude/GPT/Gemini access.
Ringkasan
Cursor Pro at $20/month is the reference "Western price" for AI coding. It buys a mature editor plus roughly $20 of usage credits across Claude, GPT and Gemini. The honest caveat: that same model access is available through Chinese plans on this site for a small fraction of the cost. This page lays out Cursor's tiers and points you to the cheaper alternatives side by side.
Harga dan tahap
| Tahap | Harga | Model | Had | Nota |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro | $20/bln | — | ~$20/month of usage credits included · access to frontier models · agent mode | The standard Cursor tier. Includes roughly $20/month of usage credits that are consumed as you run requests across Claude, GPT, Gemini and Cursor models. Annual billing is roughly 20% cheaper. |
| Pro+ | $60/bln | — | Higher usage limits than Pro · for heavier agentic workloads | — |
| Ultra | $200/bln | — | Highest usage tier · maximum request volume | — |
Kuota dan had kadar diterangkan
- Unit pembilang
- Usage is metered in USD credits consumed by model requests (Pro includes ~$20/month). Agent and fast requests are also subject to rolling-window rate limits on top of credit usage.
- Tetingkap bergolek 5-jam
- Tidak dinyatakan secara rasmi
- Kuota mingguan
- Tidak dinyatakan secara rasmi
- Kuota bulanan
- Tidak dinyatakan secara rasmi
- Serentak
- Tidak dinyatakan secara rasmi
- Segar semula kuota
- Tidak dinyatakan secara rasmi
- Apabila kuota habis
- Tidak dinyatakan secara rasmi
- Monthly billing shown; annual billing is roughly 20% cheaper.
- Heavier frontier-model and long agent runs consume the included credits faster.
Model disokong
Cursor is model-agnostic: it routes to frontier models from Anthropic (Claude), OpenAI (GPT) and Google (Gemini), plus Cursor's own models. Usage is metered as credits consumed per request.
Alat disokong
- CursorRasmi
- Claude CodeTidak disokong
- ClineTidak disokong
Siapa sesuai
Sesuai untuk
- Developers who value a polished editor and integrated agent UX over raw cost
- Teams that need SSO, centralized billing and the Teams tier
- Users benchmarking what Western AI-coding access costs
Tidak sesuai untuk
- Cost-sensitive developers who mainly need frontier-model access (see the Chinese alternatives)
- Anyone who needs China-local payment methods or RMB pricing
Kekuatan dan had
Kelebihan
- Mature, integrated editor with strong agent/tab-completion UX
- Access to Claude, GPT and Gemini from a single subscription
- No region or China-phone requirements; global USD signup
Had
- USD pricing — the most expensive baseline on this site
- Heavy agent use burns through the included credits quickly
- Lock-in to the Cursor editor
Pelan alternatif
Panduan dan bacaan berkaitan
Soalan Lazim
Is Cursor Pro worth $20/month?
If you want the most polished AI-editor experience and don't mind USD pricing, yes. If you mainly need access to Claude/GPT/Gemini models and care about cost, the Chinese plans on this site reach comparable models far more cheaply.
What's the difference between Pro, Pro+ and Ultra?
Higher tiers raise the usage ceiling — Pro includes about $20/month of credits, Pro+ and Ultra give progressively more headroom for heavy agentic use. The model access is the same.
How does Cursor compare to a Chinese coding plan?
Cursor charges Western subscription prices for model access you can get through Chinese token/code plans at a fraction of the cost. See the alternatives and the API pricing comparison on this site.
- Hobby is free; Teams is $40/user/month — not shown as separate tiers here.
- Annual billing is roughly 20% cheaper than the monthly prices shown.
Sumber dan kemas kini
Harga dan peraturan kuota boleh berubah pada bila-bila masa. Halaman ini terakhir disahkan pada 2026-07-27. Sentiasa sahkan di laman rasmi sebelum membeli.
Sumber
Sejarah kemas kini
- — Plan added as a North American price anchor for the global cost-arbitrage comparison.