CursorํŒ๋งค ์ค‘

Cursor Pro

The most popular AI code editor subscription โ€” $20/mo for Claude/GPT/Gemini access.

์‹œ์ž‘ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ$20/์›” ์ตœ์ข… ํ™•์ธ์ผ:

ํ•œ ์ค„ ์š”์•ฝ

For developers who want a polished all-in-one AI editor and will pay Western prices for it. Best-in-class UX, but the most expensive baseline on this site โ€” Chinese plans reach comparable models for a fraction of the cost.

Cursor Pro at $20/month is the reference "Western price" for AI coding. It buys a mature editor plus roughly $20 of usage credits across Claude, GPT and Gemini. The honest caveat: that same model access is available through Chinese plans on this site for a small fraction of the cost. This page lays out Cursor's tiers and points you to the cheaper alternatives side by side.

๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋ฐ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰

๋“ฑ๊ธ‰๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๋ชจ๋ธํ•œ๋„๋น„๊ณ 
Pro$20/์›”โ€”~$20/month of usage credits included ยท access to frontier models ยท agent modeThe standard Cursor tier. Includes roughly $20/month of usage credits that are consumed as you run requests across Claude, GPT, Gemini and Cursor models. Annual billing is roughly 20% cheaper.
Pro+$60/์›”โ€”Higher usage limits than Pro ยท for heavier agentic workloadsโ€”
Ultra$200/์›”โ€”Highest usage tier ยท maximum request volumeโ€”

ํ• ๋‹น๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ์†๋„ ์ œํ•œ ์„ค๋ช…

๊ณผ๊ธˆ ๋‹จ์œ„
Usage is metered in USD credits consumed by model requests (Pro includes ~$20/month). Agent and fast requests are also subject to rolling-window rate limits on top of credit usage.
5์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋กค๋ง ์œˆ๋„์šฐ
๊ณต์‹ ๋ช…์‹œ ์—†์Œ
์ฃผ๊ฐ„ ํ• ๋‹น๋Ÿ‰
๊ณต์‹ ๋ช…์‹œ ์—†์Œ
์›”๊ฐ„ ํ• ๋‹น๋Ÿ‰
๊ณต์‹ ๋ช…์‹œ ์—†์Œ
๋™์‹œ ์‹คํ–‰
๊ณต์‹ ๋ช…์‹œ ์—†์Œ
ํ• ๋‹น๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐฑ์‹ 
๊ณต์‹ ๋ช…์‹œ ์—†์Œ
ํ• ๋‹น๋Ÿ‰ ์†Œ์ง„ ์‹œ
๊ณต์‹ ๋ช…์‹œ ์—†์Œ
  • Monthly billing shown; annual billing is roughly 20% cheaper.
  • Heavier frontier-model and long agent runs consume the included credits faster.

์ง€์› ๋ชจ๋ธ

Cursor is model-agnostic: it routes to frontier models from Anthropic (Claude), OpenAI (GPT) and Google (Gemini), plus Cursor's own models. Usage is metered as credits consumed per request.

์ง€์› ๋„๊ตฌ

  • Cursor๊ณต์‹ ์ง€์›
  • Claude Code๋ฏธ์ง€์›
  • Cline๋ฏธ์ง€์›

์ ํ•ฉ/๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž

์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž

  • Developers who value a polished editor and integrated agent UX over raw cost
  • Teams that need SSO, centralized billing and the Teams tier
  • Users benchmarking what Western AI-coding access costs

๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž

  • Cost-sensitive developers who mainly need frontier-model access (see the Chinese alternatives)
  • Anyone who needs China-local payment methods or RMB pricing

์žฅ์ ๊ณผ ์ œํ•œ

์žฅ์ 

  • Mature, integrated editor with strong agent/tab-completion UX
  • Access to Claude, GPT and Gemini from a single subscription
  • No region or China-phone requirements; global USD signup

์ œํ•œ ์‚ฌํ•ญ

  • USD pricing โ€” the most expensive baseline on this site
  • Heavy agent use burns through the included credits quickly
  • Lock-in to the Cursor editor

๋Œ€์•ˆ ํ”Œ๋žœ

๊ด€๋ จ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ

์ž์ฃผ ๋ฌป๋Š” ์งˆ๋ฌธ

Is Cursor Pro worth $20/month?

If you want the most polished AI-editor experience and don't mind USD pricing, yes. If you mainly need access to Claude/GPT/Gemini models and care about cost, the Chinese plans on this site reach comparable models far more cheaply.

What's the difference between Pro, Pro+ and Ultra?

Higher tiers raise the usage ceiling โ€” Pro includes about $20/month of credits, Pro+ and Ultra give progressively more headroom for heavy agentic use. The model access is the same.

How does Cursor compare to a Chinese coding plan?

Cursor charges Western subscription prices for model access you can get through Chinese token/code plans at a fraction of the cost. See the alternatives and the API pricing comparison on this site.

๋น„๊ณ 
  • Hobby is free; Teams is $40/user/month โ€” not shown as separate tiers here.
  • Annual billing is roughly 20% cheaper than the monthly prices shown.

์ถœ์ฒ˜ ๋ฐ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ

๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ณผ ํ• ๋‹น๋Ÿ‰ ๊ทœ์น™์€ ์–ธ์ œ๋“  ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข… ํ™•์ธ์ผ: 2026-07-27. ๊ตฌ๋งค ์ „ ๊ณต์‹ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์—์„œ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์„ธ์š”.

์ •๋ณด ์ถœ์ฒ˜

์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ ๊ธฐ๋ก

  • โ€” Plan added as a North American price anchor for the global cost-arbitrage comparison.
์ตœ์ข… ํ™•์ธ์ผ: